As fate would have it, Mark Weithorn’s campaign is the gift that just keeps on giving.
I’m no clairvoyant, but I’m guessing that right about now, Miami Beach commission candidate Mark Weithorn is regretting the day he ever crossed my path.
Good.
Pretending to be a woman named “Laura Smith,” Mark Weithorn launched a smear campaign against a candidate running for North Miami Beach city council in May. He thought no one would ever discover “Laura Smith’s” real identity. In fact, I had no intention of even trying, until he made the mistake of dragging me into his drama.
Obviously to his own detriment.
Since then, I’ve made it my personal mission to make sure he doesn’t ever get elected to public office.
But, this was hardly Mark Weithorn’s first mistake.
This #DirtyPolitician has a history of screwing up pretty much everything he touches. His business and political careers have been an ongoing train wreck.
Mark Weithorn has been PERSONALLY sued by EIGHT different plaintiffs for non-payment of debt in excess of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS, two of them resulting in court ordered judgments against him totaling $102,149.67.
He started and ran THIRTEEN different businesses into the ground.
One of those businesses, DPI, Digital Printers International, Inc. (DPI), was in business for twelve years before it went bust.
One of the original founders of the company, Glenn Schmidt, sued him and obtained an Amended Final Judgment on October 13, 2009 against Mark and DPI for $13,500.00 plus interest at an annual rate of 8%.
Banco Popular obtained a Default Final Judgment on October 31, 2011 in the aggregate amount of $88,649.67.
#DirtyPolitician Mark Weithorn attempted to avoid paying those judgments by filing Articles of Dissolution for DPI, Digital Printers International, Inc. on December 31, 2009, while both lawsuits were still pending.
Although the plaintiffs can’t collect from a defunct company, Mark Weithorn is still liable for those judgments since he was sued PERSONALLY as a defendant on both lawsuits.
Just this afternoon, after receiving an anonymous tip, I discovered yet another lawsuit filed against DPI, Digital Printers International, Inc. by CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc., which was filed on January 13, 2009. According to a Final Judgment and Order Granting Replevin dated August 12, 2009, CIT was awarded a total of $64,123.06, plus interest at an annual rate of 8%.
On top of that – and here’s the really cool part – the Order Granting Replevin directs “the Sheriff to replevy such property from DPI, Digital Printers International, Inc.,” including:
(1) Xerox D250 DocuColor printer (SN#VGW629043) and
(1) D250EFI Fiery Front End (SN#AXA-608842), manuals and cords
In other words, plaintiff CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc. obtained a court order to REPOSSESS Mark’s business equipment because he couldn’t afford to pay for it.
Is this guy a loser or what?
On Tuesday, November 3, 2015, please vote responsibly!
Stephanie Kienzle
“Spreading the Wealth”
